Covariant Hamiltonian Optimization for Motion Planning (CHOMP)

1 minute read

Published:

Article Goal

Explain CHOMP (Covariant Hamiltonian Optimization for Motion Planning) in detail with visualizations and code implementations.

What is CHOMP?

CHOMP (Covariant Hamiltonian Optimization for Motion Planning) is a trajectory optimization algorithm that formulates motion planning as an optimization problem. It uses gradient-based optimization to find smooth, collision-free trajectories for robotic systems.

The intuitive explanation for CHOMP is that the objects can be thought of as magnets. The vehicle can be thought of as a manget with the same pole; the repulsive nature of the magnet pushes the magnet smoothly around the object.

A straight line vector is made to the target, and the trajectory is warped as necessary to equalize the repulsive efforts from the obstacles in the environment.

CHOMP: Written Walkthrough

Core Concepts

1. Trajectory Representation

CHOMP represents trajectories as a sequence of discrete waypoints in space. The trajectory is parameterized as a function of time.

2. Objective Function

The objective function in CHOMP consists of two main components:

  • Smoothness term: Encourages smooth trajectories
  • Obstacle term: Penalizes collisions with obstacles

3. Optimization

CHOMP uses gradient descent to minimize the objective function, iteratively improving the trajectory.

Mathematical Formulation

The objective function is given by:

\[F(\xi) = \lambda_{obs} F_{obs}(\xi) + \lambda_{smooth} F_{smooth}(\xi)\]

Where:

  • \(F_{obs}(\xi)\) is the obstacle cost
  • \(F_{smooth}(\xi)\) is the smoothness cost
  • \(\lambda_{obs}\) and \(\lambda_{smooth}\) are weighting parameters

Code Implementation

See Github

Advantages of CHOMP

  1. Smooth trajectories: Natural smoothness through optimization
  2. Collision avoidance: Explicit obstacle handling
  3. Scalability: Works for high-dimensional configuration spaces
  4. Flexibility: Easy to add custom cost terms

Limitations

  1. Local minima: Can get stuck in local optima
  2. Parameter tuning: Requires careful tuning of λ parameters
  3. Computational cost: Can be expensive for complex environments
  4. Initial trajectory: Quality depends on initial trajectory